How to make sure you answer the question in Writing Task 2

Not answering the question is probably the easiest way of losing points! No matter how good your language is, if you don’t answer the question fully and directly, you will only get 4 or 5 for Task Achievement, and your excellent vocabulary may be consider irrelevant to the topic, so that will also lower your score.

So how can you be sure you’re answering the question?

1) Turn the statement into a question

If you struggle to think of ideas when you see a Task 2, turn the statement into questions.

Look at the task below:

Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime.

Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

2) Now divide it into questions:

 Should there be fixed punishments for each type of crime? YES. Why?

• This is the only way to keep punishment fair and objective. What would happen if the judge could just choose any punishment? (people could get away with crimes)
• Fixed punishments act as a deterrent – if people know the punishment, they won’t commit the crime (so society will become safer)

Should the individual’s circumstances and motivation be taken into account? YES. Why?

• Mitigating circumstances e.g. domestic abuse cases, homeless person stealing food
• Harsh punishments can force people into poverty and into committing further crimes e.g.  if a delivery driver lost their licence, they wouldn’t be able to earn a living.

3) Decide which opinion you agree with.

At some point you have to make your opinion clear, and this could come in the first paragraph.

Why are they asking this question? Because the law is complicated and at times seems unfair.

How can we make the law fairer?

• By imposing fixed punishments?
• Or by showing compassion towards the individual?

What do you think?

The Introduction has to state the context of the question – the law is complicated and often seen as unfair. This is your Opening Statement (also known as the General Statement).

4) ‘Yes but..’ – consider what the opposite argument could be.

In the conclusion, your opinion will be clear to the reader by now, so summarise it and re-state it.

Agree that the law is not perfect, but state what you think is the best option.

---

Model Answer

Deciding on what punishment fits the crime is an incredibly complicated task. In order to simplify the legal process and to ensure fairness, fixed penalties for each crime have to be agreed on. However, there are certain circumstances when an individual’s background must be considered when deciding on the punishment. In my opinion, this is the only way that a legal system can operate fairly, and I will outline my reasons below.

There is no doubt that having fixed punishments for each type of crime brings a number of benefits. Firstly, it allows criminals to be treated fairly and ensures that no one will be discriminated against. Fixed penalties are entirely objective and have been carefully regulated over many years and by a number of legal experts. Furthermore, a fixed punishment can act as a deterrent, discouraging would-be offenders from committing crimes and leading to a safer society.

However reasonable this all seems, there are cases when ‘the law is an ass’ because it does not allow for human frailties.  Many criminals are people who have not been given the best chances in life. There may be cases when people are forced into criminal activity because of poverty, lack of education or simply for being young and vulnerable. Punishing such people harshly will only have negative consequences, for example if a homeless person is made to pay a fine for stealing, it will push him further into poverty or even more serious crimes. In such cases, the judge has to show leniency and to consider how the punishment will affect the criminal and society in the long-term.

In conclusion, although it is hard to argue against the fairness of a system which has fixed penalties for every crime, I firmly believe that considering the reasons why people commit crimes and punishing them accordingly will ultimately lead to a fairer, safer and more caring society.

(310 words)