Should public transport be free?
Read about an experiment in Estonia to find out what happened when they made buses and trains free in the capital city, Tallinn.
There’s some great vocab here that will improve your Writing:
The Language of Cause and Effect – it ‘fosters + noun’ and ‘encourages people to + verb’ ‘it benefits.. those on low incomes’ ‘it eases traffic’ and ‘reduces air pollution’ ‘boosts the economy’
The Language of EMPHASIS – ‘it was WALKERS who got on the buses’
NOUN forms – ‘Making it easy to move around fosters commercial activity‘ ‘car use dropped/public transport use increased’
ARTICLES – ‘the old, the young, the unemployed’ (for groups of people)
The Language of Change – ‘marginally decreased’ ‘increased dramatically‘ ‘dropped by a staggering 40%’
Linking words – ‘WHILE car use decreased, distance travelled went up’ ‘as well as those on a low income’
- Present Participle (ing) linking words – ‘Free public transport should encourage people to leave their cars at home, easing traffic congestion and reducing air pollution’.
Formal, academic language: ‘However, there is no indication that employment opportunities improved as a result, according to the study‘.
Here are the exact phrases taken from the text:
‘it’s good for cities because MAKING it easy for people to move around FOSTERS commercial activity.’
‘it also ENCOURAGES higher income groups to spend money in local restaurants, cafes and shops.’
‘it didn’t really ENCOURAGE many people TO stop driving.’
‘IT WAS walkers WHO hopped on buses, as the number of trips made on foot DROPPED by a STAGGERING 40%.’
‘WHILE the share of car use MARGINALLY decreased, the average distance travelled by car actually went up.’
‘Public transport use increased dramatically AMONG the old and the young, and those on a very low income, AS WELL AS those out of employment and education.
‘However, there is no indication that employment opportunities improved as a result, according to the study.’