IELTS Made Easier
Members Academy
Log in
There are many YouTube videos about how to write an introduction for IELTS Writing Task 2 and they usually suggest the ‘3-sentence template’, which is easy to memorise and adapt to any topic:
1) Neutral background statement:
[Any topic] is a controversial issue.
2) Paraphrase/rewrite the question.
[Some people think X while others think Y].
3) Say what the essay will do:
‘This essay will…’
While this ‘template’ is a useful guide for people who are just starting to develop their IELTS writing skills, it may not be the best option if you are aiming for a higher score (Band 7+).
To find out why, watch my live lesson below, or just keep reading.
Scroll down to watch the final Feedback Video.
The question we use in all the examples is this:
‘Some people say that cars are the best way of travelling around cities while others think that bicycles are better’. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The 3-sentence introduction (like the example above) is a clear and safe way to start an essay.
But it has some drawbacks.
Look at the example below. Can you see what the problem is?
Cars and buses a topic of heated discussion. Some people think that cars are the best way of traveling around cities, while others think buses are better. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.
Of course, if you then go on to write some excellent main body paragraphs, the introduction is not the most important part of the essay.
But the introduction IS important for making a good first impression.
Many websites and YouTube videos recommend that you paraphrase the question (re-write it in your own words).
There are a number of problems with paraphrasing/rewriting the question.
Look at the example below – can you see what the problems are?
The optimum method of meandering in a metropolis is a debatable issue. Some people promote four-wheeled automobiles, but other people utilise two-wheelers. This essay will discuss both sides.
The best way to write an outstanding introduction is to address the question very specifically.
Look at the example below (in favour of cars) – what do you notice?
Modern cities suffer from several problems related to car use, and recently many people have suggested that bicycles are a better option for travelling around congested town centres. However, getting around by bike has some drawbacks. This essay will argue that despite the many health and environmental benefits to cycling, cars are far more practical and convenient for most situations.
This candidate
It still follows the 3-sentence system:
Remember:
This 3-sentence structure can be used to address any question, and it relates more closely to what you will argue in the main body paragraphs.
See another example below (in favour of bicycles)
Modern cities suffer from several problems related to car use, because many people choose cars over bicycles as the most practical and convenient means of transport. However, people are beginning to realise that bicycles are a far better option for travelling around congested town centres, for both environmental and financial reasons. This essay will argue that more should be done to encourage this positive development.
To see more examples of how to paraphrase the question effectively, I would strongly recommend this video from Oxford Online English (watch from 9.13).
Check out my links to more free resources that can help you study at home.
If you want to hear all about my new lessons, podcasts, YouTube videos, challenges and courses, get your name on my email list (oh you’ll also get my free 28-Day Planner).
Sign up for the free 28-Day Planner.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Leave a Reply